ABSTRACT
Purpose: This study examines the reliability and validity of an Interprofessional Competency Assessment Scale for Undergraduates (ICASU) in the staged evaluation of an interprofessional education (IPE) program. Participants: Participants were 355 undergraduates of Sapporo Medical University, department of nursing, occupational therapy, and physical therapy. Data collection: We developed the interprofessional competency assessment form with 28 items, each using a 5-point Likert scale, to ask participants about their achievement and learning opportunities. Analysis: Deleting items that showed ceiling effects in the achievement, we performed a factor analysis. Repeating the deletions till the factor loads of all items became 0.4 or higher, 16 items were selected for the ICASU. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis on achievement and learning opportunities. Using principal factor analysis and Promax rotation, we calculated the Cronbach alpha coefficient. Results: We collected 314 (89.2%) valid responses. Factor analyses of ICASU data on achievement showed three factors: six items for ‘Basic communication skills’, four items for ‘Understanding one’s own and other occupations’, and six items for ‘Interprofessional collaboration skills’. Three similar factors were extracted on learning opportunities, showing agreement among all items except one. The α coefficients of the ICASU on the achievement and learning opportunities were 0.8 or higher. Conclusion: The findings suggest that the ICASU is composed of three factors that indicate staged interprofessional competency in undergraduates and verify the validity of concepts and internal consistency. The usefulness of this scale in the staged evaluation of IPE needs to be explored.
ABSTRACT
Recently, the palliative care team (PCT) at our hospital has included dentists. Among a total of 127 cancer patientsand required PCT intervention from 2009 to 2014, 17 patients (13.3%) had oral symptoms. Therefore, the PCT held discussions in order to determine the optimal way to treat each patient. Various symptoms, including oral pain, dry mouth, taste disturbance, furred tongue, excessive amounts of saliva, appetite loss, and trismus were treated by the dentists. As a result, the oral findings improved in all patients, while the oral symptoms improved in 16 of the 17 patients (94%). Thanks to the fact that dentists have joined the PCT, oral symptoms are effectively relieved, and PCT members now have an increased interest in oral cavity complications. Furthermore, conducting thorough examinations of the oral cavity by the PCT not only results in an improved QOL, but it has also increased the interest in the oral cavity on the part of the PCT. Therefore, more effective palliative care is expected to be achieved by promoting increased cooperation with more clinical departments.